Reconciling homogeneity and reciprocity: understanding Sungsang and Hyungsang in Divine Creation
Note 21. To the Subsection “Give and Receive Action between Sungsang and Hyungsang”
Примітка 16. До розділу “2.1.1.1. Взаємодоповнювальні стосунки між сонсан і хьонсан“
When addressing the “reciprocal relationship between Sungsang and Hyungsang,” a natural question arises: How can this be reconciled with the “essential homogeneity of Sungsang and Hyungsang”? In the section "Content of the Original Image," it was explained that Sungsang and Hyungsang, as the correlative attributes in God's creation, are essentially homogeneous since they were differentiated and made relative from God’s absolute attribute.
If Sungsang and Hyungsang are essentially homogeneous, then Sungsang is Hyungsang, and Hyungsang is Sungsang. In that case, a doubt might arise as to whether the reciprocal relationship and give-and-receive action between them would be possible.
However, this is considered a misconception that arises from misunderstanding the meaning of essential homogeneity. Essence, like universality, is the opposite concept of contingency or individuality, and homogeneity, like commonality, is the opposite concept of diversity and difference (translated from Korean, as the English snippet does not contain this detail).
Therefore, essential homogeneity is the opposite concept of individual difference. This implies that two concepts that possess essential homogeneity must also possess their individual characteristics. Thus, saying that Sungsang and Hyungsang are essentially homogeneous means that Sungsang and Hyungsang individually possess differences and characteristics. Therefore, even though Sungsang and Hyungsang were differentiated from the absolute attribute and became relative, they assume different attributes in addition to having common aspects; consequently, the reciprocal relationships and give-and-receive action between them are possible.
- An example of the reciprocal relationship
- Heisenberg’s idea of “prime-matter”
- Explanation of the concepts “homogeneous elements” and “absolute attributes”
- Materialism, idealism and the “Theory of Oneness” from the point of view of monism
- David Bohm’s exploration of the realm of consciousness and the Theory of Oneness
- Appliance Geulincx’s occasionalism idea to epistemological questions
- What does the actualization of love mean to people?
- Two views on who owns the Universal Prime Force
- The concept of “inner dual characteristics”
- Freedom and necessity on the example of driving a car
- Cleve Baxter’s plant experiment
- J. Charon’s theory of complex relativity
- Reconciling homogeneity and reciprocity: understanding Sungsang and Hyungsang in Divine Creation
- Union and multiplication: the dynamics of sungsang and hyungsang in divine interaction
- Purpose and heart: centers of union and multiplication in the dynamics of sungsang and hyungsang
- Development as multiplication: a Divine Principle perspective on creation and growth
- Instinctive vs. rational creativity: comparing humans and animals
- Freedom: freedom of mind, freedom of emotions, or freedom of will?
- Complex and simple ideas as spiritual molds in Divine Creation
- Solving logical deadlocks: the role of the inner developmental four position foundation in the original sungsang
- Understanding the Pan-Divine-Image theory: clarifying Unification thought in contrast to pantheism
- Exploring living idea-molds: understanding the concept of a living mold in divine creation
- Distinguishing the inner sungsang of logos: creation of humans vs. creation of all things
- Three stages of growth and the number three in divine principle
- Proof of the existence of God