J. Charon’s theory of complex relativity
Note 19. To the Subsection “2.2.3. Logos Is the Union of Reason and Law”
Примітка 14. До розділу “1.2.2.3. Логос — це єдність розуму і принципів“
Based on his theory of complex relativity, Jean E. Charon, theoretical physicist at the University of Paris, explained that electrons and photons themselves are microcosms equipped with mechanisms of memory and thinking.
The theory of complex relativity, in which complex numbers are used, refers to an extension of the theory of relativity. A complex number consists of a real number and an imaginary number. In physics, natural phenomena are usually described within a four-dimensional world of time and space using real numbers. In the theory of relativity as well, phenomena are described in the four-dimensional world of time and space using real numbers.
Yet, in the theory of complex relativity, the four-dimensional world of time and space in imaginary numbers is added. Hence, phenomena are described in an eight-dimensional world of time and space. The imaginary world of time and space is a “closed world” without extension; therefore, it is impossible to observe this world from the real world. Charon says that this imaginary world actually exists in the same way that our consciousness does.
Thus, the universe consists of the real, material existence and the imaginary, spiritual existence, and we are beings that can perceive these two existences. According to this theory of complex relativity, even elementary particles like electrons and photons have mechanisms of memory and thinking.
- An example of the reciprocal relationship
- Heisenberg’s idea of “prime-matter”
- Explanation of the concepts “homogeneous elements” and “absolute attributes”
- Materialism, idealism and the “Theory of Oneness” from the point of view of monism
- David Bohm’s exploration of the realm of consciousness and the Theory of Oneness
- Appliance Geulincx’s occasionalism idea to epistemological questions
- What does the actualization of love mean to people?
- Two views on who owns the Universal Prime Force
- The concept of “inner dual characteristics”
- Freedom and necessity on the example of driving a car
- Cleve Baxter’s plant experiment
- J. Charon’s theory of complex relativity
- Reconciling homogeneity and reciprocity: understanding Sungsang and Hyungsang in Divine Creation
- Union and multiplication: the dynamics of sungsang and hyungsang in divine interaction
- Purpose and heart: centers of union and multiplication in the dynamics of sungsang and hyungsang
- Development as multiplication: a Divine Principle perspective on creation and growth
- Instinctive vs. rational creativity: comparing humans and animals
- Freedom: freedom of mind, freedom of emotions, or freedom of will?
- Complex and simple ideas as spiritual molds in Divine Creation
- Solving logical deadlocks: the role of the inner developmental four position foundation in the original sungsang
- Understanding the Pan-Divine-Image theory: clarifying Unification thought in contrast to pantheism
- Exploring living idea-molds: understanding the concept of a living mold in divine creation
- Distinguishing the inner sungsang of logos: creation of humans vs. creation of all things
- Three stages of growth and the number three in divine principle
- Proof of the existence of God