Heisenberg’s idea of “prime-matter”
Note 5. To the Subsection “Original Hyungsang and Science”
Примітка 3. До розділу “1.1.1.2.2. Первісний хьонсан і наука“
From around 1951, Werner Heisenberg (1901-76), the founder of quantum physics, dealt with the unified theory of elementary particles and advocated the idea of “prime-matter.” This theory asserts that the elementary particles that have been observed, of which there are approximately 300, have come into being from a prime-matter, the ultimate matter, following a cosmic equation expressed in a certain mathematical form. Heisenberg also said that “prime-matter” is the same as “prime-energy,” and that all the various kinds of elementary particles (therefore, all matter) of the universe consists of prime-energy. The prime-matter, or prime-energy, advocated by Heisenberg can be regarded as pointing to pre-matter, or pre-energy, as advocated by Unification Thought.
Today it is known that all matter consists of quarks and leptons. Recently the “sub-quark” model has been advocated. This model states that quarks and leptons are made of even more basic particles, and active research is being conducted into that area. Specifically, the sub-quark model states that all matter is made of sub-quarks, and that there are three kinds of sub-quarks, which can be regarded as different states of a single sub-quark. If this theory is correct, it follows that all matter is made of a single, basic substance. This can be seen as a contemporary version of Heisenberg’s monistic unified model. For further reference, see Hidezumi Terasawa’s Sub-quark Physics and Original Geometry (in Japanese) (Tokyo, Kyoritsu Shuppan Sha,1982), 17-21.
- An example of the reciprocal relationship
- Heisenberg’s idea of “prime-matter”
- Explanation of the concepts “homogeneous elements” and “absolute attributes”
- Materialism, idealism and the “Theory of Oneness” from the point of view of monism
- David Bohm’s exploration of the realm of consciousness and the Theory of Oneness
- Appliance Geulincx’s occasionalism idea to epistemological questions
- What does the actualization of love mean to people?
- Two views on who owns the Universal Prime Force
- The concept of “inner dual characteristics”
- Freedom and necessity on the example of driving a car
- Cleve Baxter’s plant experiment
- J. Charon’s theory of complex relativity
- Reconciling homogeneity and reciprocity: understanding Sungsang and Hyungsang in Divine Creation
- Union and multiplication: the dynamics of sungsang and hyungsang in divine interaction
- Purpose and heart: centers of union and multiplication in the dynamics of sungsang and hyungsang
- Development as multiplication: a Divine Principle perspective on creation and growth
- Instinctive vs. rational creativity: comparing humans and animals
- Freedom: freedom of mind, freedom of emotions, or freedom of will?
- Complex and simple ideas as spiritual molds in Divine Creation
- Solving logical deadlocks: the role of the inner developmental four position foundation in the original sungsang
- Understanding the Pan-Divine-Image theory: clarifying Unification thought in contrast to pantheism
- Exploring living idea-molds: understanding the concept of a living mold in divine creation
- Distinguishing the inner sungsang of logos: creation of humans vs. creation of all things
- Three stages of growth and the number three in divine principle
- Proof of the existence of God